FAQ

Studies in Polish Linguistics

Wyniki wyszukiwania

wyszukiwarka prosta

szukaj np. “cognitive architectures” AND 1993-200 NOT Urban
wyszukiwanie zaawansowane
np. 1234-6789
np. 10.4467/16890027AP.16.022.6009
np. Uniwersytet Jagielloński

The Spectrum of Sense Remoteness in Polysemy: Bridging Computational and Theoretical Lexicography with Psycholinguistics (Part 2)

Data publikacji: 2022

Studies in Polish Linguistics, Volume 17 (2022), Vol. 17, Issue 2, s. 55 - 73

https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920SPL.22.003.16380

Autorzy

,
Dorota Klimek-Jankowska
Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Polska, plac Uniwersytecki 1, 50-137 Wrocław
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3102-1384 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →
,
Krzysztof Hwaszcz
Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Polska, plac Uniwersytecki 1, 50-137 Wrocław
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2136-5001 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →
Justyna Wieczorek
Politechnika Wrocławska
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7880-6069 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Pobierz pełny tekst

Pobierz PDF PDF
Drukuj drukuj Cytuj cytuj Udostępnij udostępnij __T_ARROW_DOWN

Tytuły

The Spectrum of Sense Remoteness in Polysemy: Bridging Computational and Theoretical Lexicography with Psycholinguistics (Part 2)

Abstrakt

This two-part paper bridges insights from psycholinguistics and from theoretical and computational lexicography to develop a fine-grained classification of polysemy organized along a wider spectrum of sense remoteness of ambiguous words in Polish based on the investigation of a large collection of linguistic data. In the second part, we show that polysemy is not a stable phenomenon and relations between senses may differ across language users. For instance, our fifty-fifty class or borderline cases may be represented differently by different language users depending on their perception of the world, world knowledge, associations. We point to some parameters of variation in the class of polysemy by metonymy and polysemy by metaphor which may affect their sense remoteness and consequently also the way they are represented in the mental lexicon.

Słowa kluczowe

Linked materials

The Spectrum of Sense Remoteness in Polysemy: Bridging Computational and Theoretical Lexicography with Psycholinguistics (Part 1).

Bibliografia

Pobierz bibliografię
Apresjan Jurij D. (1974). Semantyka leksykalna. Synonimiczne środki języka. Wrocław‒Warszawa‒Kraków: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
Carston Robyn (2020). Polysemy: Pragmatics and sense conventions. Mind and Language 36(1), 108–133.
Dölling Johannes (2020). Systematic polysemy. In The Blackwell Companion to Semantics, Daniel Gutzmann, Lisa Matthewson, Cecile Meier, Hotze Rullmann, Thomas E. Zimmerman (eds.). Oxford: Wiley.
Falkum Ingrid L. (2010). Systematic polysemy and the count-mass distinction. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 16–40.
Falkum Ingrid L. (2011). The semantics and pragmatics of polysemy: A relevancetheoretic account. PhD Thesis. University College London.
Foraker Stephani, Murphy Gregory L. (2012). Polysemy in sentence comprehension: Effects of meaning dominance. Journal of Memory and Language 67(4), 407–425.
Frazier Lyn, Rayner Keith (1990). Taking on semantic commitments: Processing multiple meanings vs. multiple senses. Journal of Memory and Language 29(2), 181–200.
Frisson Steven (2009). Semantic underspecification in language processing. Language and Linguistic Compass 3(1), 111–127.
Frisson Steven (2015). About bound and scary books: The processing of book polysemies. Lingua 157, 17–35.
Frisson Steven, Pickering Martin J. (1999). The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25(6), 1366–1383.
Frisson Steven, Pickering Martin J. (2007). The processing of familiar and novel senses of a word: Why reading Dickens is easy but reading Needham can be hard. Language and Cognitive Processes 22(4), 595–613.
Haber Janosh, Poesio Massimo (2020). Assessing Polyseme Sense Similarity through Co-predication Acceptability and Contextualised Embedding Distance. Proceedings of the Ninth Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics, 114–124.
Klepousniotou Ekaterini, Baum Shari R. (2007). Disambiguating the ambiguity advantage effect in word recognition: An advantage for polysemous but not homonymous words. Journal of Neurolinguistics 20(1), 1–24.
Klepousniotou Ekaterini, Pike Bruce G., Steinhauer Karsten, Gracco Vincent (2012). Not all ambiguous words are created equal: An EEG investigation of homonymy and polysemy. Brain and Language 123, 11–21.
Klepousniotou Ekaterini, Titone Debra A., Romero Carolina (2008). Making sense of word senses: The comprehension of polysemy depends on sense overlap. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34(6), 1534–1543.
Klein Devorah E., Murphy Gregory L. (2001). The representation of polysemous words. Journal of Memory and Language 45(2), 259–282.
Klein Devorah E., Murphy Gregory L. (2002). Paper has been my ruin: Conceptual relations of polysemous senses. Journal of Memory and Language 47(4), 548–570. 
Lakoff George (2014). Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: Metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8, 958.
Markowski Andrzej (2012). Wykłady z leksykologii. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Murphy Elliot (2021). Linguistic representation and processing of copredication (PhD Thesis), University College London.
Ortega-Andrés Marina, Vicente Agustin (2019). Polysemy and co-predication. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1), 1.
Pickering Martin J., Frisson Steven (2001). Processing ambiguous verbs: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27(2), 556–573.
Pustejovsky James (1995). The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 
Pylkkänen Liina, Llinás Rodolfo, Murphy Gregory L. (2006). The representation of polysemy: Meg evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18(1), 97–109.
Schumacher Petra (2013). When combinatorial processing results in reconceptualization: Toward a new approach of compositionality. Frontiers in Psychology 4, 677.
Schumacher Petra B. (2019). Metonymy. In The Oxford Handbook of Experimental Semantics and Pragmatics, Chris Cummins, Napoleon Katsos (eds.), 316‒330. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Informacje

Informacje: Studies in Polish Linguistics, Volume 17 (2022), Vol. 17, Issue 2, s. 55 - 73

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Angielski:

The Spectrum of Sense Remoteness in Polysemy: Bridging Computational and Theoretical Lexicography with Psycholinguistics (Part 2)

Autorzy

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3102-1384

Dorota Klimek-Jankowska
Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Polska, plac Uniwersytecki 1, 50-137 Wrocław
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3102-1384 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Polska, plac Uniwersytecki 1, 50-137 Wrocław

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2136-5001

Krzysztof Hwaszcz
Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Polska, plac Uniwersytecki 1, 50-137 Wrocław
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2136-5001 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Polska, plac Uniwersytecki 1, 50-137 Wrocław

Publikacja: 2022

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY ikona licencji

Finansowanie artykułu:

This research was internally partially supported by the Center for Corpus and Experimental Research on Slavic Languages ‘Slavicus’ of Wrocław University.

Udział procentowy autorów:

Dorota Klimek-Jankowska (Autor) - 33%
Krzysztof Hwaszcz (Autor) - 33%
Justyna Wieczorek (Autor) - 34%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski

Liczba wyświetleń: 655

Liczba pobrań: 404

<p>The Spectrum of Sense Remoteness in Polysemy: Bridging Computational and Theoretical Lexicography with Psycholinguistics (Part 2)</p>
Pobierz PDF Pobierz xml